Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 


The particles cascade off the body of a swimmer as she emerges from the pool, reacting with an inaudible fizz on contact with their opposites streaming from the skin of a spectator. This reaction produces a dangerous force; a gravity which, built up over coffee and phone calls, results in a collision. Depending on the density of particles, this collision may be one of hands, lips or--in the strongest cases--feet, legs, and genitalia. With collision comes a critical mass and an infra-red explosion of radiation that may induce a tiny seed growth in the body of the female from which a mighty tumour will grow.

Having completed their reaction, the particles may orbit the couple for a time, decaying according to a half-life that is dependant on status and cleanliness and taste in musical compact discs. Very occasionally the particles may find complimentary domains within the two-body collision. In this case they are strengthened and will remain bound in energetic orbits, the cyclical excitation and decay of which will find expression in romantic dinners and thoughtful gifts.

Conversely if the particles are found to completely oppose the domains in their respective partners, a repulsive force is generated. The energy from this force is most commonly expressed as promises to maintain contact and perhaps a parting embrace.
©2009 `apocathary
:iconapocathary:

Author's Comments

Particles as a metaphor for attraction/lust! Seeing what happens when you take something sexy and describe it in an unsexy way :eyes:

For #Writers-Workshop's Poetry and Prose Workshop, 'More Metaphor Please!'

Critiques


Thank you for your Critique

You are not logged in.

Comments


love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icon2pinksink:
This is an interesting piece very unique perspective and I kind of get what you're trying to say. But I'm not entirely clear on what it is you are comparing, you are saying __?__ = __?__

Also the writing feels a like mechanical and doesn't flow so well but thats just a preference I have I like writing the flows smoothly

--
"Whatever you do,
don't congratulate yourself too much
or berate yourself, either.
Your choices are half chance,
so are everybody else's."
:bonk:
:iconapocathary:
Hey, thanks for commenting! My attempt at metaphor was to liken the reaction of subatomic particles to the reaction that one feels when attracted to another person.

Also, I'm really glad you mentioned that the writing style as mechanical, as it most certainly is! Scientific writing is nearly always conducted in passive voice, which means that it ends up sounding mechanical. For example, in normal writing you say 'Garry threw the ball', whereas in scientific writing you might say 'The ball was thrown by Garry'. While it may not flow as well as active voice, I figured it would be more true to the science behind the idea.

Thank you for reading and thanks for your comments! (:

--
soup's up :: sound off :: imagine
:icon2pinksink:
you're welcome and that's a great comparison! and I think that in this case the mechanical style or writing does work as much as its not my taste.

--
"Whatever you do,
don't congratulate yourself too much
or berate yourself, either.
Your choices are half chance,
so are everybody else's."
:bonk:
:iconapocathary:
Heh, no problem, thanks for reading! (:

--
soup's up :: sound off :: imagine
:iconmaz-maz:
Experiment conclusion: failed

Hypothesis: When describing something sexy in an unsexy way, as one reader has said (moi) 'it just took the 'sex' out of 'sexy' and instead added the emotion one gets from an excessively long lecture of calculus into the equation.'

--
Watch the Arrivals, NOW, I am serious it will open your eyes.
Watch at-least the first three parts and then decide whether to continue watching or not.

Here's the website:
[link]
:iconfriedemann:
The mechanical approach was intended and supports the metaphor the author chose.

Given the brevity of this piece, I find it laughable to liken it to "an excessively long lecture of calculus."

An immaterial complaint

Not bad Phil. I hope you don't candlelight your sweetheart with scientific jargon.
:D

--
#interns | #LITplease | #Writers-Workshop
:iconstormywolf:
It took a little while to get into it, as I focused on the pool a little long, but after that it flowed quite well. It was enjoyable, though depending on the person, your description might be quite sexy indeed... Ah sweet nerds XD
:iconbatousaijin:
beautiful :D

--
"They spoil every romance by trying to make it last forever." --Oscar Wilde
:icongrecianurn:
I enjoyed your original perspective here - personally, I found the scientific approach to the romance refreshing and at moments, quite revelatory and funny. Your prose creates distance in a situation where the reader expect intimacy and relies on empiricism where the reader anticipates it will be buoyed up by emotion.

I must admit, however, that while I find your translation of love into scientific terms commendable, I don't necessarily see it as entirely conforming to the metaphor requirement of the workshop. I mean, after all, science, the intricate balances of genes, atoms, hormones and pheromones, really are already a part of love and two human bodies interacting, although romantics often try to ignore it. In my opinion, you've done a great job of shifting the context of love from emotions to science but I don't see this text actually engaging in a powerful, direct metaphor that transforms one object or idea into something completely different. The raven hasn't become the writing desk, you know what I mean? Or am I missing something here?

Found in these Groups:

group avatar #Writers-Workshop
Where writers workshop writing!

Details

November 2
1.4 KB

Statistics

32
13 [who?]
195 (0 today)
1 (0 today)

Share

Link
Thumb

Site Map